For this 'Discuss both views' essay, dedicate one distinct body paragraph to each perspective: one for starting school earlier and another for starting later. Avoid the common pitfall of merging both views or giving disproportionate attention to one, as this will compromise your Task Response score. Present the arguments for each side objectively in their respective paragraphs before introducing your personal opinion, which should be clearly articulated in the conclusion.

When discussing starting earlier, you could reference countries like France or Belgium, where formal schooling often begins around age three, focusing on early literacy and numeracy benefits. For starting later, consider the Scandinavian model (e.g., Finland, Sweden) where formal instruction typically starts at age seven, emphasizing play-based learning and social-emotional development in early years. You might also mention studies on 'school readiness' or the potential for 'burnout' in children pushed too early, contrasting with the benefits of extended 'unstructured play' for cognitive development.

The most common mistake on this question is failing to adequately *discuss* both views, instead merely listing points for each side or presenting them as facts without elaboration. To avoid this, ensure you explain *why* people hold these views, providing reasoning and potential implications for each argument. For example, don't just say 'earlier is good for academics'; explain *how* early exposure to structured learning environments can foster foundational skills and potentially lead to academic advantages.

To transition effectively between discussing the two opposing views, employ clear contrastive linking phrases at the beginning of your second body paragraph. Phrases like 'Conversely,' 'On the other hand,' or 'While proponents of early schooling argue X, others contend Y' effectively signal a shift in perspective. Within each paragraph, use additive or elaborative links (e.g., 'Furthermore,' 'Moreover,' 'Consequently') to build on your arguments, ensuring coherence and cohesion throughout your essay.

Examiners look for a nuanced discussion that acknowledges the complexities of the issue, rather than presenting a simplistic 'either/or' argument. A band 8-9 response will demonstrate sophisticated vocabulary related to child development and education, alongside complex grammatical structures used accurately and flexibly. Crucially, your own opinion in the conclusion should be well-supported by the preceding discussion, showing critical thinking and a clear, consistent stance, often with a balanced perspective that acknowledges merits on both sides before leaning towards one.