Some people believe that organic farming is the solution to food security problems. Others argue that modern agricultural technology is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

To achieve a high score, dedicate one distinct body paragraph to each perspective: one fully exploring organic farming's role in food security, and another detailing modern agricultural technology's contributions. Avoid merging arguments or presenting a one-sided discussion before your conclusion, as this undermines task response for a 'discuss both views' essay.

For organic farming, consider its benefits like reduced environmental impact and improved soil health, citing examples of local food systems in developing nations fostering resilience. For modern technology, discuss its capacity for increased yields through GMOs or precision agriculture, referencing the Green Revolution's impact on food production in countries like India.

A frequent error is discussing organic farming or modern tech in general terms without explicitly linking them back to 'food security problems.' Ensure every point you make clearly explains how each approach either solves or contributes to food security, using phrases like 'addressing food scarcity' or 'ensuring nutritional access.'

Employ clear contrastive linking phrases between paragraphs and within your discussion of each view. For example, 'While proponents of organic methods highlight sustainability, advocates for technological advancement often point to scalability.' Within paragraphs, use 'Furthermore,' 'However,' or 'Consequently' to build coherent arguments.

Examiners look for a nuanced discussion that acknowledges the complexities – that neither approach is a singular panacea, but rather part of a multifaceted solution. A band 8-9 response will demonstrate sophisticated vocabulary related to agriculture and food systems, complex grammatical structures, and a well-supported, clear personal opinion that synthesizes the preceding arguments.