For 'To what extent' questions, state a clear position in your introduction (e.g., 'I largely disagree' or 'I partially agree'). If you partially agree/disagree, clearly define the extent. For instance, you might acknowledge minor negative influences but argue that the overall impact is neutral or even positive, ensuring this nuanced stance is consistently reinforced throughout your body paragraphs.

Consider arguments such as: 1) Digital platforms like Wattpad or online news portals actually increase young people's exposure to diverse forms of text, fostering new reading habits. 2) While informal 'textspeak' exists, it often represents a separate register, and tools like collaborative online documents (e.g., Google Docs) can enhance formal writing and editing skills for academic projects. 3) The development of digital literacy, essential for navigating online information and communicating effectively in the modern world, is a crucial skill nurtured by these technologies.

The most common mistake on this question is drifting into general discussions about screen time, social isolation, or mental health, rather than strictly focusing on *reading and writing skills*. To avoid this, ensure every point you make directly links back to how computers and mobile phones for communication specifically affect aspects like vocabulary acquisition, comprehension, grammar, spelling, sentence structure, or the ability to produce coherent text.

Employ a concessionary linking strategy to demonstrate a balanced yet firm opinion. Start a paragraph by acknowledging a counter-argument using phrases like 'Admittedly, concerns about...' or 'While it is true that...', then immediately pivot with 'However, a more comprehensive view reveals...' or 'Nevertheless, this perspective overlooks...' to strengthen your own stance.

Examiners look for a sophisticated understanding of the complex relationship between technology and literacy. A band 8-9 answer will not just list pros and cons, but will analyze *how* digital communication shapes literacy skills, perhaps discussing the evolution of literacy in a digital age, the distinction between informal and formal registers, or the development of new forms of 'digital literacy' that are equally vital.