Some people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

State your clear position (e.g., 'I largely disagree' or 'I strongly agree') in your introduction and ensure every body paragraph directly supports this stance. To acknowledge the opposing view without weakening your argument, use concessionary phrases like 'While it is true that...' or 'Admittedly, some may argue...', immediately followed by a strong rebuttal or qualification such as 'however, this perspective often overlooks...' to pivot back to your main argument.

Consider specific arguments such as how video conferencing platforms (e.g., Zoom, Skype) enable families to maintain strong ties across geographical distances, or how online support groups foster niche communities for individuals with shared interests or challenges. Conversely, you could discuss the 'phubbing' phenomenon (phone snubbing) in social settings or reference studies linking excessive social media use to feelings of isolation, despite increased connectivity.

The most common mistake on this question is generalising about 'technology' without specifying its various forms or how they impact relationships. Avoid simply listing generic pros and cons of technology; instead, focus precisely on how specific communication technologies (e.g., instant messaging, social networking sites, video calls) either enhance or detract from the quality, depth, or frequency of social interactions.

For this opinion-based essay, employ a contrastive linking strategy. When presenting your main points, use strong affirmative transitions like 'Crucially,' 'Furthermore,' or 'Another compelling argument is that'. If you choose to acknowledge the counter-argument, introduce it with 'Admittedly,' or 'Conversely, some contend that,' and then immediately follow with a strong contrasting link such as 'However, this viewpoint neglects...' or 'Nonetheless, the predominant evidence suggests...'.

Examiners look for a nuanced and sophisticated argument that explores the complexity of modern communication's impact, rather than a simplistic 'good' or 'bad' stance. A band 8-9 answer will demonstrate a deep understanding by discussing how technology is used, by whom, and for what purpose, using precise vocabulary related to social dynamics and providing well-developed, specific examples that clearly illustrate the points made, all while maintaining a consistent and well-supported position.