For this 'outweigh' question, structure your body paragraphs clearly: dedicate one paragraph to the advantages and another to the disadvantages. Crucially, your introduction and conclusion must take a definitive stance on whether the advantages truly outweigh the disadvantages, rather than just listing both sides.

When discussing advantages, consider the rise of digital nomads in places like Bali or Portugal, benefiting from lower costs of living and diverse cultural experiences while working remotely for companies worldwide. For disadvantages, think about the 'brain drain' phenomenon in developing nations, where skilled professionals migrate to more developed economies, potentially hindering local growth and innovation.

A common mistake is treating 'globalization' and 'modern technology' as separate entities or focusing too heavily on just one. Ensure your arguments explicitly link how *both* globalization (e.g., ease of international movement, interconnected economies) *and* modern technology (e.g., high-speed internet, video conferencing) collaboratively enable people to live and work anywhere. Avoid merely listing general pros and cons of technology or globalization in isolation.

To effectively transition between discussing advantages and disadvantages, use contrastive linking phrases. For example, after detailing the benefits, you could introduce the counter-arguments with 'However, this global mobility is not without its drawbacks,' or 'While these advantages are significant, it is equally important to consider the potential downsides.' This clearly signals a shift in perspective.

Examiners look for a nuanced discussion that explores the *implications* of this trend beyond surface-level points. A band 8-9 response will not only list pros and cons but also delve into the socio-economic impacts on both individuals and societies, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the interconnectedness of globalization, technology, and human migration patterns. Furthermore, a strong argument for why one side outweighs the other, supported by well-developed reasoning, is crucial.