For this question, take a clear stance that technology fundamentally enhances the teacher's role, rather than diminishing it, by shifting their focus. While acknowledging valid concerns about potential over-reliance on tech or loss of human connection, firmly argue that these are challenges to be managed through strategic adaptation, not reasons to resist change.

When discussing changes, highlight the shift from 'sage on the stage' to 'guide on the side,' where teachers curate digital resources and facilitate collaborative learning, rather than solely delivering content. For adaptation, emphasize the development of 'human-centric' skills like critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and creativity, which technology cannot replicate, citing examples like Finland's pedagogical shift towards project-based learning that leverages digital tools.

A common pitfall is discussing technology's general impact on education without explicitly linking it to the teacher's evolving role and specific adaptation strategies. Avoid simply listing technological advancements; instead, for each technology mentioned, clearly explain how it changes what a teacher does and then propose a concrete way a teacher should adapt to leverage or mitigate that change.

To effectively transition between discussing changes and proposing adaptations, use cause-and-effect linking phrases such as 'Consequently,' 'As a result of this shift,' or 'In light of these developments.' When introducing adaptation strategies, employ phrases like 'Therefore, teachers must prioritise,' 'It is imperative that educators embrace,' or 'A crucial adaptation involves,' to clearly signpost your recommendations.

Examiners look for a nuanced understanding of pedagogical shifts, not just a list of technologies, demonstrating how teachers transition from content delivery to facilitating complex skills. A band 8-9 response will offer well-developed arguments for specific adaptations, using precise academic vocabulary related to educational psychology and digital pedagogy, while maintaining a consistent, well-supported position throughout the essay.