द्रुत सन्दर्भ: यस पृष्ठमा ब्यान्ड 6.0 देखि ब्यान्ड 8.0 सम्मका 10 नमूना {ielts} {task2} निबन्धहरू छन्, जसमा ओपिनियन, डिस्कसन, समस्या-समाधान, फाइदा-बेफाइदा, र दुई-भाग प्रश्न प्रकारहरू समेटिएका छन्। प्रत्येक निबन्धले देखाउँछ कि परीक्षकहरूले प्रत्येक ब्यान्ड स्तरमा के पुरस्कृत गर्छन्।
{ielts} {writingTask2} नमूना निबन्धहरू ब्यान्ड स्कोरहरूसहित
Oleksii VasylenkoIELTS 8.0
संस्थापक र IELTS तयारी विशेषज्ञ
प्रमाणित परीक्षकहरूद्वारा स्कोर गरिएका वास्तविक {ielts} {writingTask2} निबन्धहरूको अध्ययन गर्नुहोस्। प्रत्येक निबन्धमा चारवटा मापदण्डहरूको विस्तृत ब्यान्ड विवरण समावेश छ: {taskAchievement}, {coherenceCohesion}, {lexicalResource}, र {grammaticalRange}।
निबन्धहरूको समीक्षा र स्कोरिङ मे 2026 मा गरिएको। ब्यान्ड स्कोरहरू आधिकारिक {ielts} डिस्क्रिप्टरहरू अनुसार क्यालिब्रेट गरिएका छन्।
ब्यान्ड 6.0 नमूना निबन्धहरू
ब्यान्ड 6 का निबन्धहरूले पर्याप्त शब्दावली र व्याकरणसहित कार्यको सक्षम ह्यान्डलिङ प्रदर्शन गर्छन्। विचारहरू सान्दर्भिक छन् तर गहिराइ वा विकासको कमी हुन सक्छ।
Band 6.0ओपिनियन (सहमत/असहमत)268 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू विश्वास गर्छन् कि बालबालिकाहरूलाई कम्तीमा 12 वर्षको उमेर नपुगेसम्म स्मार्टफोन प्रयोग गर्न अनुमति दिनु हुँदैन। तपाईं कुन हदसम्म सहमत वा असहमत हुनुहुन्छ?
नमूना उत्तर
In today's world, smartphones have become an important part of daily life. Some people think children under 12 should not use smartphones. I partially agree with this view because while smartphones can be harmful for young children, they also offer some educational benefits.
On the one hand, there are good reasons to keep smartphones away from young children. First, children can become addicted to games and social media, which affects their studies and physical health. Many children spend hours watching videos instead of playing outside or reading books. Second, young children may see inappropriate content online that they are too young to understand.
On the other hand, smartphones can be useful for education. There are many apps that help children learn mathematics, languages, and science in an interesting way. Also, children need to learn how to use technology because it is essential for their future careers. If they only start using smartphones at 12, they may fall behind their classmates.
In conclusion, I believe that a complete ban on smartphones for children under 12 is too strict. Instead, parents should limit screen time and monitor what their children do on their phones. This way, children can benefit from technology while avoiding its dangers.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
6.0
{coherenceCohesion}
6.0
{lexicalResource}
6.0
{grammaticalRange}
6.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
6.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले विषयलाई सम्बोधन गर्छ र सहायक विचारहरूसहित स्पष्ट स्थिति प्रस्तुत गर्छ। तथापि, विचारहरू केही हदसम्म सामान्य छन् र गहिराइको कमी छ। अनुच्छेद व्यवस्था तार्किक छ तर जोडक उपकरणहरू यान्त्रिक छन् ('On the one hand', 'On the other hand')। शब्दावली पर्याप्त छ तर सामान्य शब्दहरूमा सीमित छ। व्याकरणले सरल र जटिल वाक्यहरूको मिश्रण देखाउँछ जसमा केही त्रुटिहरू छन् जसले सञ्चारमा बाधा पुर्याउँदैनन्।
Band 6.0समस्या र समाधान272 शब्द
प्रश्न
विश्वभरका धेरै शहरहरूमा वायु प्रदूषण बढ्दै गइरहेको छ। यस समस्याका कारणहरू के हुन् र सरकारहरूले यसलाई कम गर्न के उपायहरू अपनाउन सक्छन्?
नमूना उत्तर
Air pollution is a serious problem in many cities today. This essay will discuss the main causes of air pollution and suggest some solutions that governments can implement.
The main cause of air pollution is the increasing number of cars and trucks on the roads. Vehicles produce harmful gases like carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which make the air dirty. Another cause is factories that release smoke and chemicals into the atmosphere. In developing countries, many factories do not have proper filters to clean their emissions. Additionally, the burning of coal and gas for electricity contributes to poor air quality.
Governments can take several steps to address this problem. Firstly, they can invest in public transportation systems to reduce the number of private cars on the roads. If buses and trains are cheap and convenient, more people will use them. Secondly, governments can create stricter laws for factories regarding pollution limits. Companies that break these rules should receive heavy fines. Finally, governments should promote renewable energy sources like solar and wind power to replace fossil fuels.
In conclusion, air pollution is mainly caused by vehicles, factories, and fossil fuels. Governments can reduce this problem by improving public transport, enforcing pollution laws, and supporting clean energy.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
6.0
{coherenceCohesion}
6.5
{lexicalResource}
6.0
{grammaticalRange}
6.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
6.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले आवश्यकता अनुसार कारण र समाधान दुवैलाई समेटेको छ। विचारहरू सान्दर्भिक छन् तर अनुमानयोग्य छन् र मौलिक विश्लेषणको कमी छ। संगठन स्पष्ट छ र अनुच्छेद संरचना राम्रो छ। जोडक उपकरणहरू प्रयोग गरिएका छन् तर कहिलेकाहीं सूत्रबद्ध छन् ('Firstly', 'Secondly', 'Finally')। शब्दावली पर्याप्त छ तर सामान्य संयोजनहरूमा निर्भर छ। व्याकरण सामान्यतया सही छ तर सीमित विविधतासहित।
ब्यान्ड 7.0 नमूना निबन्धहरू
ब्यान्ड 7 का निबन्धहरूले विचारहरूको स्पष्ट विकाससहित अङ्ग्रेजीमा राम्रो दक्षता देखाउँछन्। शब्दावली विविध छ र व्याकरणले संरचनाहरूको राम्रो विविधता देखाउँछ।
Band 7.0डिस्कसन (दुवै दृष्टिकोण)285 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू सोच्छन् कि सबै विश्वविद्यालयका विद्यार्थीहरूले आफूले चाहेको जुनसुकै विषय पढ्नु पर्छ। अरूहरू विश्वास गर्छन् कि उनीहरूलाई भविष्यमा उपयोगी हुने विषयहरू मात्र पढ्न अनुमति दिनुपर्छ, जस्तै विज्ञान र प्रविधिसँग सम्बन्धित विषयहरू। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको चर्चा गर्नुहोस् र आफ्नो राय दिनुहोस्।
नमूना उत्तर
The question of whether university students should have complete freedom in choosing their subjects or be directed towards practically useful fields is a matter of ongoing debate. While there are compelling arguments for guiding students towards market-relevant disciplines, I believe that academic freedom, balanced with career awareness, produces the most well-rounded graduates.
Proponents of restricting choices to applied subjects argue that higher education represents a significant investment of public and private resources. From this perspective, it seems logical that graduates should emerge with skills that directly contribute to economic productivity. Countries facing skills shortages in engineering, healthcare, or technology may struggle to compete globally if too many students pursue subjects with limited employment prospects. Furthermore, students themselves may benefit from studying disciplines with clearer career pathways, reducing the risk of unemployment after graduation.
However, limiting academic choice overlooks several critical factors. Innovation frequently emerges at the intersection of diverse fields — philosophy informs artificial intelligence ethics, history shapes political policy, and psychology underpins user experience design. A society composed entirely of technical specialists would lack the critical thinkers, artists, and communicators who enrich cultural life and challenge established norms. Moreover, students who are passionate about their chosen field tend to achieve higher academic standards and develop transferable skills such as analysis, communication, and creative problem-solving.
In my view, universities should maintain broad subject availability while ensuring students receive honest guidance about employment realities. This approach respects individual agency while acknowledging practical considerations, ultimately producing graduates who are both fulfilled and employable.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.0
{lexicalResource}
7.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
7.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको राम्ररी विकसित चर्चा प्रस्तुत गर्छ र स्पष्ट व्यक्तिगत स्थिति राख्छ। विचारहरू सान्दर्भिक उदाहरणहरूसहित विस्तारित र समर्थित छन्। अनुच्छेद कुशल छन् र स्पष्ट प्रगति देखाउँछन्। जोडक उपकरणहरूको विविधता लचिलो रूपमा प्रयोग गरिएको छ। शब्दावलीले राम्रो विविधता देखाउँछ जसमा केही कम सामान्य शब्दहरू समावेश छन् ('market-relevant disciplines', 'underpins')। जटिल वाक्यहरू राम्रो शुद्धतासहित बनाइएका छन्, यद्यपि कहिलेकाहीं त्रुटिहरू हुन्छन्।
Band 7.0ओपिनियन (सहमत/असहमत)279 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू भन्छन् कि सार्वजनिक स्वास्थ्यमा सुधार गर्ने सबैभन्दा राम्रो तरिका खेलकुद सुविधाहरूको सङ्ख्या बढाउनु हो। तथापि, अरूहरू भन्छन् कि यसले सार्वजनिक स्वास्थ्यमा बहुत कम प्रभाव पार्नेछ र अन्य उपायहरू आवश्यक छन्। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको चर्चा गर्नुहोस् र आफ्नो राय दिनुहोस्।
नमूना उत्तर
Public health remains a critical concern for governments worldwide, and the role of sports infrastructure in promoting physical well-being is frequently debated. While expanding sports facilities can encourage active lifestyles, I would argue that a multifaceted approach combining infrastructure with education and policy changes is considerably more effective.
Advocates of building more sports facilities contend that accessibility is the primary barrier to exercise. When gyms, swimming pools, and playing fields are readily available within communities, residents are more likely to incorporate physical activity into their routines. Research consistently demonstrates that proximity to exercise facilities correlates positively with activity levels, particularly in lower-income areas where residents cannot afford private gym memberships. The visibility of these facilities also serves as a constant reminder of the importance of physical fitness.
Nevertheless, simply constructing buildings does not guarantee usage. Many existing sports centres operate well below capacity, suggesting that the barriers to exercise are psychological and cultural rather than purely logistical. People who work long hours may lack the energy or motivation to exercise regardless of facility availability. Additionally, public health encompasses far more than physical activity — nutrition, mental health, preventive healthcare, and pollution reduction all play vital roles that sports facilities cannot address.
In conclusion, while improved sports infrastructure forms one component of a public health strategy, governments should simultaneously invest in health education programmes, subsidise nutritious food options, and implement workplace wellness policies. Only through this comprehensive approach can meaningful improvements in population health be achieved.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.5
{lexicalResource}
7.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
7.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
उत्तरले प्रश्नका सबै भागहरूलाई स्पष्ट स्थितिसहित सम्बोधन गर्छ। विचारहरू सान्दर्भिक प्रमाणहरूसहित राम्ररी विस्तारित छन्। अनुच्छेद तार्किक छन् र अनुच्छेदहरूभित्र र बीचमा प्रभावकारी जोडको प्रयोग छ। शब्दावली शैली र संयोजनको केही जागरूकतासहित पर्याप्त छ ('multifaceted approach', 'correlates positively')। जटिल संरचनाहरूको विविधता राम्रो नियन्त्रणसहित प्रयोग गरिएको छ, यद्यपि जोखिम-मुक्त छैन।
Band 7.0फाइदा र बेफाइदा291 शब्द
प्रश्न
विश्वव्यापीकरणले संसारको हरेक कुनामा बहुराष्ट्रिय कम्पनीहरूको विस्तारलाई जन्म दिएको छ। केही मानिसहरू सोच्छन् कि यो सकारात्मक विकास हो, जबकि अरूहरू असहमत छन्। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको चर्चा गर्नुहोस् र आफ्नो राय दिनुहोस्।
नमूना उत्तर
The proliferation of multinational corporations across the globe has generated polarised opinions regarding its impact on local economies and cultures. While these companies bring undeniable economic benefits, I believe their presence requires careful regulation to prevent the erosion of local business ecosystems and cultural identity.
The advantages of multinational expansion are primarily economic. These corporations create employment opportunities in regions where jobs may otherwise be scarce, often paying wages above local averages and providing training that develops the workforce. They introduce efficient business practices, advanced technology, and supply chain infrastructure that can modernise local industries. Consumers benefit from greater product variety, competitive pricing, and consistent quality standards that smaller domestic companies may struggle to match.
Conversely, the dominance of global brands can devastate local commerce. Small businesses frequently cannot compete with the pricing power and marketing budgets of international giants, leading to closures that hollow out traditional high streets and markets. This economic displacement often accompanies cultural homogenisation — identical coffee shops, fashion retailers, and fast-food chains replace distinctive local establishments that reflect community character. Furthermore, profits generated by multinationals are typically repatriated to headquarters abroad rather than being reinvested in the host economy.
My position is that globalisation through multinational presence is neither inherently positive nor negative — its impact depends entirely on governance. Countries that enforce fair competition laws, mandate local hiring quotas, and protect culturally significant businesses can harness economic benefits while preserving what makes their communities distinctive.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.0
{lexicalResource}
7.5
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
7.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको स्पष्ट विस्तार र निश्चित व्यक्तिगत रायसहित चर्चा गरिएको छ। संगठन तार्किक छ र प्रत्येक अनुच्छेदले स्पष्ट कार्य गर्छ। शब्द सम्पदा एक बलियो पक्ष हो — 'proliferation', 'polarised', 'repatriated', 'homogenisation' ले परिष्कार देखाउँछन्। व्याकरणले सामान्यतया राम्रो नियन्त्रणसहित विविधता प्रदर्शन गर्छ। मामूली अप्ठ्यारोपनले सञ्चारमा बाधा पुर्याउँदैन।
ब्यान्ड 7.5 नमूना निबन्धहरू
ब्यान्ड 7.5 का निबन्धहरूले परिष्कृत शब्दावली, सूक्ष्म तर्कहरू, र धेरै राम्रो व्याकरणिक नियन्त्रणसहित बलियो लेखन क्षमता प्रदर्शन गर्छन्।
Band 7.5दुई-भाग प्रश्न288 शब्द
प्रश्न
अझ धेरै मानिसहरू परम्परागत कार्यालयको सट्टा घरबाट काम गर्न रोज्दैछन्। यसो किन भइरहेको छ? के तपाईं सोच्नुहुन्छ कि यो सकारात्मक वा नकारात्मक विकास हो?
नमूना उत्तर
The shift towards remote working has accelerated dramatically in recent years, transforming how millions of professionals approach their careers. This trend is driven by technological advancement and evolving priorities, and while it presents certain challenges, I consider it a predominantly positive development for both individuals and society.
Several interconnected factors explain the migration from office to home. Most fundamentally, digital communication tools have eliminated the technical necessity of physical co-location for many knowledge-based roles. Video conferencing, cloud collaboration platforms, and project management software enable seamless coordination regardless of geography. Simultaneously, workers — particularly younger generations — increasingly prioritise flexibility, autonomy, and work-life integration over traditional markers of career success. The pandemic period demonstrated conclusively that productivity need not suffer outside conventional office environments, dismantling decades of managerial scepticism.
I view this development as largely beneficial for multiple reasons. Eliminating commutes saves workers considerable time and money while significantly reducing transport-related carbon emissions — a meaningful environmental dividend at scale. The geographical liberation of remote work enables skilled professionals to live in affordable regions rather than clustering in expensive urban centres, potentially reducing housing inequality. Companies benefit from access to global talent pools and reduced overhead costs. However, these advantages must be weighed against legitimate concerns: social isolation, difficulty maintaining professional boundaries, and the challenge of mentoring junior staff remotely demand thoughtful solutions.
Ultimately, the remote work revolution represents an evolution rather than a disruption. Organisations that develop hybrid models — combining the flexibility of remote work with purposeful in-person collaboration — will likely achieve optimal outcomes for both productivity and employee wellbeing.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
7.5
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
7.5
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
7.5
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
दुवै प्रश्नहरूलाई राम्ररी विकसित विचारहरूसहित पूर्ण रूपमा सम्बोधन गरिएको छ। उत्तरले निर्बाध परिवर्तनहरूसहित परिष्कृत अनुच्छेद व्यवस्थापन प्रदर्शन गर्छ। जोड एक उल्लेखनीय बलियो पक्ष हो — विचारहरू यान्त्रिक जोडबिना प्राकृतिक रूपमा बग्छन्। शब्दावली सटीक र विविध छ ('geographical liberation', 'managerial scepticism', 'environmental dividend')। व्याकरणले राम्रो विविधता देखाउँछ यद्यपि केही वाक्यहरू अत्यधिक जटिल छन्।
Band 7.5डिस्कसन (दुवै दृष्टिकोण)295 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू सोच्छन् कि अपराध कम गर्ने सबैभन्दा राम्रो तरिका लामो जेल सजाय दिनु हो। तथापि, अरूहरू विश्वास गर्छन् कि अपराध कम गर्ने अझ राम्रा वैकल्पिक तरिकाहरू छन्। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको चर्चा गर्नुहोस् र आफ्नो राय दिनुहोस्।
नमूना उत्तर
Criminal justice policy represents one of the most contested areas of public debate, with opinions ranging from strictly punitive approaches to rehabilitation-focused alternatives. While longer prison sentences may serve certain limited purposes, I am convinced that evidence-based preventive measures offer far greater potential for sustained crime reduction.
The rationale for extended incarceration rests on two principles: deterrence and incapacitation. Theoretically, the prospect of lengthy imprisonment should discourage potential offenders from committing crimes, while those already convicted are physically prevented from reoffending during their sentence. This approach appeals to public sentiment, particularly following high-profile violent crimes where communities demand visible consequences. For genuinely dangerous individuals who pose ongoing threats to public safety, prolonged removal from society may indeed be the only responsible option.
However, extensive criminological research challenges the assumption that harsher sentences meaningfully deter crime. Recidivism rates in countries with punitive systems often exceed those in nations favouring rehabilitation, suggesting that prison environments may actually reinforce criminal behaviour rather than discourage it. Alternative approaches — community service programmes, restorative justice conferences, addiction treatment, educational opportunities, and early intervention in at-risk communities — address the root causes that drive individuals towards criminal activity. These measures are demonstrably more cost-effective than incarceration while producing lower reoffending rates.
In my assessment, effective crime reduction requires investing in upstream prevention rather than downstream punishment. A society that provides adequate education, mental health support, and economic opportunity will inevitably experience less crime than one which simply builds larger prisons. Incarceration should remain available for the most serious offences, but it cannot constitute a comprehensive crime strategy.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
7.5
{coherenceCohesion}
7.5
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.5
समग्र ब्यान्ड
7.5
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले सूक्ष्म तर्कसहित एक जटिल विषयको परिष्कृत ह्यान्डलिङ प्रदर्शन गर्छ। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूलाई उचित सावधानीहरूसहित पूर्ण विकास प्राप्त भएको छ। शब्द सम्पदा सबैभन्दा उत्कृष्ट मापदण्ड हो — 'recidivism', 'restorative justice', 'upstream prevention' ले विषय-विशिष्ट सटीकता देखाउँछन्। व्याकरण महत्वाकांक्षी निर्माणहरूसहित विविध र धेरैजसो सही छ। संगठन उत्कृष्ट छ र प्रत्येक अनुच्छेद अघिल्लोमा निर्माण गर्छ।
ब्यान्ड 8.0 नमूना निबन्धहरू
ब्यान्ड 8 का निबन्धहरूले परिष्कृत शब्दावली, सटीकतासहित प्रयोग गरिएको जटिल व्याकरण, र पूर्ण रूपमा विकसित, सूक्ष्म तर्कहरूसहित अङ्ग्रेजीमा विशेषज्ञ दक्षता प्रदर्शन गर्छन्।
Band 8.0ओपिनियन (सहमत/असहमत)302 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू महसुस गर्छन् कि सरकारले अपराध रोक्नको लागि सबै इन्टरनेट र फोन सञ्चारहरूको निगरानी गर्न सक्षम हुनुपर्छ। अरूहरू विश्वास गर्छन् कि यसले गोपनीयताको उल्लङ्घन गर्छ र यसलाई कहिल्यै अनुमति दिनु हुँदैन। तपाईं कुन हदसम्म सहमत वा असहमत हुनुहुन्छ?
नमूना उत्तर
The tension between state security powers and individual privacy rights has intensified as digital communication becomes the primary medium for both legitimate discourse and criminal planning. I firmly believe that unrestricted government surveillance is fundamentally incompatible with democratic principles, though I acknowledge the necessity of targeted, judicially-supervised monitoring in specific circumstances.
Mass surveillance programmes, regardless of their stated justification, pose existential threats to free societies. When citizens know their communications may be monitored, they self-censor — a phenomenon documented extensively in behavioural research — diminishing the open discourse upon which democratic governance depends. History demonstrates that surveillance powers, once granted, invariably expand beyond their original mandate; temporary emergency measures become permanent fixtures. The practical case against blanket monitoring is equally compelling: security services become overwhelmed with data, potentially missing genuine threats amid billions of innocuous communications. The false positive problem alone renders mass surveillance operationally counterproductive.
This does not imply that law enforcement should operate blind in the digital realm. Targeted surveillance, authorised by independent judiciary upon demonstration of probable cause, represents a proportionate mechanism that balances security needs with civil liberties. This framework — essentially the digital equivalent of a physical search warrant — has functioned effectively in democratic legal systems for centuries and requires only updated application rather than fundamental reimagining.
The critical distinction lies between monitoring populations and investigating suspects. The former treats all citizens as potential criminals, corroding social trust; the latter applies established legal principles to new technological contexts. I therefore advocate for robust judicial oversight mechanisms, strict data retention limits, and meaningful penalties for surveillance abuse, while supporting law enforcement's ability to investigate specific threats through proper channels.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
8.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले एक परिष्कृत, सूक्ष्म स्थिति प्रस्तुत गर्छ जसले श्वेत-श्याम सोचबाट बच्छ। विचारहरू प्रमाण र तार्किक तर्क समावेश गर्दै गहिराइमा विकसित गरिएका छन्। अनुच्छेद कुशल छन् र प्रत्येक अनुच्छेदले एक विशिष्ट अलङ्कारिक कार्य गर्छ। शब्दावली सटीक, विविध छ र संयोजन तथा रजिस्टरको पूर्ण जागरूकतासहित प्रयोग गरिएको छ ('judicially-supervised', 'existential threats', 'operationally counterproductive')। व्याकरणले जटिल निर्माणहरूमा दुर्लभ त्रुटिहरूसहित व्यापक विविधता देखाउँछ।
Band 8.0डिस्कसन (दुवै दृष्टिकोण)298 शब्द
प्रश्न
केही मानिसहरू सोच्छन् कि विद्यालयहरूले गणित र विज्ञान जस्ता शैक्षिक विषयहरूमा बढी ध्यान दिनुपर्छ। अरूहरू विश्वास गर्छन् कि कला र सङ्गीत शिक्षा पनि त्यत्तिकै महत्त्वपूर्ण छ। दुवै दृष्टिकोणहरूको चर्चा गर्नुहोस् र आफ्नो राय दिनुहोस्।
नमूना उत्तर
Educational priorities reflect deeper societal assumptions about what constitutes valuable knowledge and how young people should be prepared for adult life. While academic subjects undeniably equip students with essential analytical capabilities, I contend that art and music education develops distinct cognitive and emotional competencies that are not merely supplementary but foundational to human flourishing.
The case for prioritising academic disciplines rests on pragmatic economic reasoning. Mathematics, science, and technology drive innovation, economic growth, and national competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-based global economy. Students who excel in these areas typically access more lucrative career paths, and nations with strong STEM performance consistently rank higher in development indices. From a pedagogical standpoint, these subjects develop rigorous logical thinking, evidence evaluation, and quantitative literacy — skills transferable across virtually every professional context.
However, characterising arts education as a luxury misunderstands both its nature and its effects. Neuroscientific research reveals that musical training strengthens working memory, attention control, and mathematical reasoning — the very capacities that STEM subjects require. Visual art develops spatial intelligence, observational precision, and iterative problem-solving through prototyping and revision. Beyond cognitive benefits, arts engagement cultivates emotional intelligence, cultural empathy, and the capacity for original thought that distinguishes human contribution from algorithmic processing. In an era where artificial intelligence increasingly performs routine analytical tasks, creative and interpretive abilities become humanity's comparative advantage.
My position is that the academic-versus-arts framing represents a false dichotomy. Effective education integrates both: mathematics provides the framework for musical composition; scientific inquiry mirrors artistic experimentation; literary analysis sharpens the same critical faculties as hypothesis testing. Schools should resist artificial hierarchies between disciplines and instead recognise that intellectual rigour manifests differently across domains.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.5
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
8.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
प्रत्येक अनुच्छेदले विशिष्ट अलङ्कारिक चालहरूमार्फत तर्कलाई अगाडि बढाउँछ — असाधारण संगठन। निष्कर्षले बहस आफैँलाई पुनर्परिभाषित गर्छ — परिष्कृत आलोचनात्मक सोचको चिन्ह। शब्द सम्पदाले सटीक शैक्षिक शब्दावली देखाउँछ ('false dichotomy', 'comparative advantage', 'iterative problem-solving') जुन प्राकृतिक रूपमा प्रयोग गरिएको छ। व्याकरण जटिल निर्माणहरूमा विविध र लगभग त्रुटि-मुक्त छ। जोड यान्त्रिक जोडकहरूको सट्टा सन्दर्भ र प्रतिस्थापनसहित निर्बाध छ।
Band 8.0समस्या र समाधान305 शब्द
प्रश्न
धेरै देशहरूले आफ्नो वातावरणसम्बन्धी समस्याहरूको सामना गरिरहेका छन्, विशेषगरी प्रदूषण र प्राकृतिक स्रोतहरूको अत्यधिक प्रयोगको सन्दर्भमा। यी समस्याहरूका कारणहरू के हुन्, र तिनलाई सम्बोधन गर्न के उपायहरू अपनाउन सकिन्छ?
नमूना उत्तर
Environmental degradation through pollution and resource depletion represents perhaps the defining challenge of our era, driven by structural economic incentives that prioritise short-term extraction over long-term sustainability. Addressing these interlinked crises requires systemic interventions that realign economic behaviour with ecological limits.
The root causes extend far beyond individual consumption choices. Industrial economies are fundamentally designed to externalise environmental costs — manufacturers bear no financial consequence for atmospheric pollution, agricultural operations are not charged for watershed contamination, and resource extraction companies need not fund ecosystem restoration. This structural misalignment means that environmentally destructive practices remain artificially profitable. Compounding this, rapid urbanisation concentrates pollution impacts while extending supply chains across continents, obscuring the environmental consequences of consumption from consumers. Population growth and rising living standards amplify demand for energy, food, and materials, accelerating depletion of finite resources.
Effective solutions must operate at the systemic level rather than relying on voluntary behavioural change. Carbon pricing mechanisms — whether cap-and-trade systems or direct taxation — internalise environmental costs, making clean alternatives economically competitive rather than aspirationally virtuous. Circular economy legislation requiring manufacturers to design for disassembly and reuse transforms waste from an inevitable byproduct into a design failure. Investment in renewable infrastructure at scale — solar, wind, and storage — addresses the energy system that underlies most pollution categories. Critically, international cooperation frameworks must prevent regulatory arbitrage, where polluting industries simply relocate to jurisdictions with weaker environmental standards.
These measures are not merely desirable but economically rational when accounting for the staggering costs of climate adaptation, healthcare expenditure from pollution-related illness, and resource scarcity. The transition to sustainable economies represents not a sacrifice of prosperity but a redefinition of it — one that future generations will consider not radical but obvious.
ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
8.5
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
समग्र ब्यान्ड
8.0
परीक्षकको टिप्पणी
निबन्धले असाधारण गहिराइको विश्लेषण प्रदर्शन गर्छ, सतही कारणहरूभन्दा पर गएर प्रणालीगत आर्थिक संयन्त्रहरूसम्म पुग्छ। कारण र समाधान दुवैलाई परिष्कृत तर्कसहित पूर्ण रूपमा विकसित गरिएको छ। शब्द सम्पदा उत्कृष्ट छ — 'externalise environmental costs', 'regulatory arbitrage', 'circular economy legislation' ले विशेषज्ञ शब्दावलीमा सटीक दक्षता देखाउँछन्। व्याकरणले जटिल नाम समूहहरू र अधीनस्थतासहित व्यापक विविधता र लचिलोपन देखाउँछ। निष्कर्षले तर्कलाई दार्शनिक स्तरमा उठाउँछ।
आफ्नो निबन्धको स्कोर तुरुन्तै प्राप्त गर्नुहोस्
आफ्नो निबन्ध पेश गर्नुहोस् र चारवटा मापदण्डहरूमा विस्तृत ब्यान्ड स्कोर विवरण र प्रतिक्रिया प्राप्त गर्नुहोस् — हजारौं परीक्षक-स्कोर गरिएका निबन्धहरूमा प्रशिक्षित AI द्वारा संचालित।
अहिले मेरो निबन्ध स्कोर गर्नुहोस्बारम्बार सोधिने प्रश्नहरू
{ielts} {writingTask2} निबन्धहरूको स्कोर कसरी गरिन्छ?
{ielts} {writingTask2} निबन्धहरूको मूल्याङ्कन चार मापदण्डहरूमा गरिन्छ: {taskAchievement} (25%), {coherenceCohesion} (25%), {lexicalResource} (25%), र {grammaticalRange} (25%)। प्रत्येक मापदण्डलाई 0-9 सम्म पूर्ण वा आधा ब्यान्डमा स्कोर गरिन्छ, र चारवटा स्कोरहरूको औसत समग्र {writingTask2} ब्यान्ड हुन्छ।
ब्यान्ड 6 र ब्यान्ड 7 को निबन्धमा के फरक छ?
ब्यान्ड 6 को निबन्धले सान्दर्भिक विचारहरूसहित कार्यलाई सम्बोधन गर्छ तर सामान्य वा अविकसित हुन सक्छ। ब्यान्ड 7 को निबन्धले स्पष्ट प्रगतिसहित विस्तारित विचारहरू प्रस्तुत गर्छ, कम सामान्य शब्दावली प्रयोग गर्छ, र राम्रो शुद्धतासहित जटिल वाक्यहरू बनाउँछ। मुख्य फरक विकासको गहिराइ र भाषाको सटीकतामा छ।
{ielts} {task2} निबन्ध कति शब्दको हुनुपर्छ?
तपाईंले कम्तीमा 250 शब्द लेख्नुपर्छ। अधिकांश ब्यान्ड 7+ निबन्धहरू 270-310 शब्दका हुन्छन्। 250 भन्दा उल्लेखनीय कम लेख्दा जरिवाना हुन्छ। 300 भन्दा बढी शब्द लेख्नु ठीक छ तर त्रुटिहरूको सम्भावना बढ्छ — लम्बाइभन्दा गुणस्तर बढी महत्त्वपूर्ण छ।
के म यी नमूना निबन्धहरू मेरो {ielts} परीक्षामा प्रयोग गर्न सक्छु?
होइन — कण्ठस्थ गरिएका निबन्धहरूले ब्यान्ड 0 पाउँछन्। परीक्षकहरू कण्ठस्थ उत्तरहरू पहिचान गर्न प्रशिक्षित छन्। यी नमूनाहरूको प्रयोग प्रत्येक ब्यान्ड स्तर कस्तो देखिन्छ भनेर बुझ्न गर्नुहोस्, त्यसपछि विभिन्न प्रश्नहरूमा आफ्ना उत्तरहरू लेख्ने अभ्यास गर्नुहोस्।
{ielts} {writingTask2} मा कुन प्रश्न प्रकारहरू आउँछन्?
पाँच मुख्य प्रश्न प्रकारहरू छन्: ओपिनियन (सहमत/असहमत), डिस्कसन (दुवै दृष्टिकोण + राय), समस्या र समाधान, फाइदा र बेफाइदा, र दुई-भाग प्रश्नहरू। प्रत्येकलाई अलि फरक संरचना चाहिन्छ, तर सबैमा स्पष्ट स्थिति र विकसित सहायक विचारहरू आवश्यक छन्।
Get your IELTS band score in 60 seconds
अब अभ्यास सुरु गर