빠른 참고: 이 페이지에는 밴드 6.0부터 밴드 8.0까지의 {ielts} {task2} 샘플 에세이 10편이 수록되어 있으며, 의견형, 토론형, 문제-해결형, 장단점형, 두 파트 질문 유형을 다루고 있습니다. 각 에세이는 각 밴드 수준에서 시험관이 무엇을 평가하는지 정확히 보여줍니다.
{ielts} {writingTask2} 샘플 에세이 밴드 점수 포함
Oleksii VasylenkoIELTS 8.0
설립자 및 IELTS Band Score 전문가
공인 시험관이 채점한 실제 {ielts} {writingTask2} 에세이를 학습하세요. 각 에세이에는 {taskAchievement}, {coherenceCohesion}, {lexicalResource}, {grammaticalRange} 등 4가지 평가 기준에 대한 상세한 밴드 점수 분석이 포함되어 있습니다.
2026년 5월에 에세이 검토 및 채점 완료. 밴드 점수는 {ielts} 공식 채점 기준에 맞게 조정되었습니다.
밴드 6.0 샘플 에세이
밴드 6 에세이는 적절한 어휘와 문법으로 과제를 능숙하게 처리하는 능력을 보여줍니다. 아이디어는 관련성이 있지만 깊이나 전개가 부족할 수 있습니다.
Band 6.0의견형 (동의/반대)268단어
문제
일부 사람들은 아이들이 최소 12세가 될 때까지 스마트폰을 사용해서는 안 된다고 생각합니다. 이 의견에 어느 정도 동의하거나 반대합니까?
샘플 답변
In today's world, smartphones have become an important part of daily life. Some people think children under 12 should not use smartphones. I partially agree with this view because while smartphones can be harmful for young children, they also offer some educational benefits.
On the one hand, there are good reasons to keep smartphones away from young children. First, children can become addicted to games and social media, which affects their studies and physical health. Many children spend hours watching videos instead of playing outside or reading books. Second, young children may see inappropriate content online that they are too young to understand.
On the other hand, smartphones can be useful for education. There are many apps that help children learn mathematics, languages, and science in an interesting way. Also, children need to learn how to use technology because it is essential for their future careers. If they only start using smartphones at 12, they may fall behind their classmates.
In conclusion, I believe that a complete ban on smartphones for children under 12 is too strict. Instead, parents should limit screen time and monitor what their children do on their phones. This way, children can benefit from technology while avoiding its dangers.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
6.0
{coherenceCohesion}
6.0
{lexicalResource}
6.0
{grammaticalRange}
6.0
종합 밴드
6.0
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 주제를 다루고 뒷받침하는 아이디어와 함께 명확한 입장을 제시합니다. 그러나 아이디어가 다소 일반적이고 깊이가 부족합니다. 단락 구성은 논리적이지만 응집 장치가 기계적입니다('On the one hand', 'On the other hand'). 어휘는 적절하지만 일반적인 단어에 한정되어 있습니다. 문법은 단문과 복문이 혼합되어 있으며 의사소통을 방해하지 않는 일부 오류가 있습니다.
Band 6.0문제와 해결책272단어
문제
전 세계 많은 도시에서 대기 오염이 증가하고 있습니다. 이 문제의 원인은 무엇이며, 정부가 이를 줄이기 위해 어떤 조치를 취할 수 있습니까?
샘플 답변
Air pollution is a serious problem in many cities today. This essay will discuss the main causes of air pollution and suggest some solutions that governments can implement.
The main cause of air pollution is the increasing number of cars and trucks on the roads. Vehicles produce harmful gases like carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which make the air dirty. Another cause is factories that release smoke and chemicals into the atmosphere. In developing countries, many factories do not have proper filters to clean their emissions. Additionally, the burning of coal and gas for electricity contributes to poor air quality.
Governments can take several steps to address this problem. Firstly, they can invest in public transportation systems to reduce the number of private cars on the roads. If buses and trains are cheap and convenient, more people will use them. Secondly, governments can create stricter laws for factories regarding pollution limits. Companies that break these rules should receive heavy fines. Finally, governments should promote renewable energy sources like solar and wind power to replace fossil fuels.
In conclusion, air pollution is mainly caused by vehicles, factories, and fossil fuels. Governments can reduce this problem by improving public transport, enforcing pollution laws, and supporting clean energy.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
6.0
{coherenceCohesion}
6.5
{lexicalResource}
6.0
{grammaticalRange}
6.0
종합 밴드
6.0
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 요구사항대로 원인과 해결책을 모두 다루고 있습니다. 아이디어는 관련성이 있지만 예측 가능하고 독창적인 분석이 부족합니다. 명확한 단락 구조로 잘 구성되어 있습니다. 응집 장치가 사용되지만 때때로 정형화되어 있습니다('Firstly', 'Secondly', 'Finally'). 어휘는 충분하지만 일반적인 연어에 의존합니다. 문법은 대체로 정확하지만 범위가 제한적입니다.
밴드 7.0 샘플 에세이
밴드 7 에세이는 아이디어의 명확한 전개와 함께 우수한 영어 구사력을 보여줍니다. 어휘가 다양하고 문법은 폭넓은 구조를 사용합니다.
Band 7.0토론형 (양측 견해)285단어
문제
일부 사람들은 대학생들이 원하는 과목을 무엇이든 공부해야 한다고 생각합니다. 다른 사람들은 과학기술과 같이 미래에 유용한 과목만 공부하도록 허용해야 한다고 생각합니다. 두 가지 견해를 모두 논의하고 자신의 의견을 제시하세요.
샘플 답변
The question of whether university students should have complete freedom in choosing their subjects or be directed towards practically useful fields is a matter of ongoing debate. While there are compelling arguments for guiding students towards market-relevant disciplines, I believe that academic freedom, balanced with career awareness, produces the most well-rounded graduates.
Proponents of restricting choices to applied subjects argue that higher education represents a significant investment of public and private resources. From this perspective, it seems logical that graduates should emerge with skills that directly contribute to economic productivity. Countries facing skills shortages in engineering, healthcare, or technology may struggle to compete globally if too many students pursue subjects with limited employment prospects. Furthermore, students themselves may benefit from studying disciplines with clearer career pathways, reducing the risk of unemployment after graduation.
However, limiting academic choice overlooks several critical factors. Innovation frequently emerges at the intersection of diverse fields — philosophy informs artificial intelligence ethics, history shapes political policy, and psychology underpins user experience design. A society composed entirely of technical specialists would lack the critical thinkers, artists, and communicators who enrich cultural life and challenge established norms. Moreover, students who are passionate about their chosen field tend to achieve higher academic standards and develop transferable skills such as analysis, communication, and creative problem-solving.
In my view, universities should maintain broad subject availability while ensuring students receive honest guidance about employment realities. This approach respects individual agency while acknowledging practical considerations, ultimately producing graduates who are both fulfilled and employable.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.0
{lexicalResource}
7.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
종합 밴드
7.0
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 두 가지 견해를 잘 전개하고 명확한 개인적 입장을 제시합니다. 아이디어는 관련 예시와 함께 확장되어 뒷받침됩니다. 단락 구성이 능숙하며 명확한 논리적 전개가 있습니다. 응집 장치가 유연하게 사용됩니다. 어휘는 좋은 범위를 보여주며 덜 일반적인 표현도 포함합니다('market-relevant disciplines', 'underpins'). 복문이 좋은 정확도로 작성되었으나 간헐적 오류가 발생합니다.
Band 7.0의견형 (동의/반대)279단어
문제
일부 사람들은 공중보건을 개선하는 가장 좋은 방법이 스포츠 시설의 수를 늘리는 것이라고 말합니다. 그러나 다른 사람들은 이것이 공중보건에 거의 영향을 미치지 않으며 다른 조치가 필요하다고 말합니다. 두 가지 견해를 모두 논의하고 자신의 의견을 제시하세요.
샘플 답변
Public health remains a critical concern for governments worldwide, and the role of sports infrastructure in promoting physical well-being is frequently debated. While expanding sports facilities can encourage active lifestyles, I would argue that a multifaceted approach combining infrastructure with education and policy changes is considerably more effective.
Advocates of building more sports facilities contend that accessibility is the primary barrier to exercise. When gyms, swimming pools, and playing fields are readily available within communities, residents are more likely to incorporate physical activity into their routines. Research consistently demonstrates that proximity to exercise facilities correlates positively with activity levels, particularly in lower-income areas where residents cannot afford private gym memberships. The visibility of these facilities also serves as a constant reminder of the importance of physical fitness.
Nevertheless, simply constructing buildings does not guarantee usage. Many existing sports centres operate well below capacity, suggesting that the barriers to exercise are psychological and cultural rather than purely logistical. People who work long hours may lack the energy or motivation to exercise regardless of facility availability. Additionally, public health encompasses far more than physical activity — nutrition, mental health, preventive healthcare, and pollution reduction all play vital roles that sports facilities cannot address.
In conclusion, while improved sports infrastructure forms one component of a public health strategy, governments should simultaneously invest in health education programmes, subsidise nutritious food options, and implement workplace wellness policies. Only through this comprehensive approach can meaningful improvements in population health be achieved.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.5
{lexicalResource}
7.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
종합 밴드
7.0
시험관 코멘트
답변은 과제의 모든 부분을 다루며 일관된 명확한 입장을 보여줍니다. 아이디어는 관련 근거와 함께 잘 전개되어 있습니다. 단락 구성이 논리적이며 단락 내, 단락 간 응집이 효과적입니다. 어휘는 충분하며 문체와 연어에 대한 인식이 보입니다('multifaceted approach', 'correlates positively'). 다양한 복합 구조가 사용되었으며 좋은 통제력을 보이지만 위험 부담이 없는 것은 아닙니다.
Band 7.0장점과 단점291단어
문제
세계화로 인해 다국적 기업이 세계 곳곳으로 확산되었습니다. 일부 사람들은 이것이 긍정적인 발전이라고 생각하지만, 다른 사람들은 동의하지 않습니다. 두 가지 견해를 모두 논의하고 자신의 의견을 제시하세요.
샘플 답변
The proliferation of multinational corporations across the globe has generated polarised opinions regarding its impact on local economies and cultures. While these companies bring undeniable economic benefits, I believe their presence requires careful regulation to prevent the erosion of local business ecosystems and cultural identity.
The advantages of multinational expansion are primarily economic. These corporations create employment opportunities in regions where jobs may otherwise be scarce, often paying wages above local averages and providing training that develops the workforce. They introduce efficient business practices, advanced technology, and supply chain infrastructure that can modernise local industries. Consumers benefit from greater product variety, competitive pricing, and consistent quality standards that smaller domestic companies may struggle to match.
Conversely, the dominance of global brands can devastate local commerce. Small businesses frequently cannot compete with the pricing power and marketing budgets of international giants, leading to closures that hollow out traditional high streets and markets. This economic displacement often accompanies cultural homogenisation — identical coffee shops, fashion retailers, and fast-food chains replace distinctive local establishments that reflect community character. Furthermore, profits generated by multinationals are typically repatriated to headquarters abroad rather than being reinvested in the host economy.
My position is that globalisation through multinational presence is neither inherently positive nor negative — its impact depends entirely on governance. Countries that enforce fair competition laws, mandate local hiring quotas, and protect culturally significant businesses can harness economic benefits while preserving what makes their communities distinctive.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
7.0
{coherenceCohesion}
7.0
{lexicalResource}
7.5
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
종합 밴드
7.0
시험관 코멘트
두 가지 견해가 명확하게 전개되고 확실한 개인적 의견이 제시되었습니다. 각 단락이 명확한 기능을 수행하는 논리적 구성입니다. 어휘력이 강점으로, 'proliferation', 'polarised', 'repatriated', 'homogenisation'은 세련됨을 보여줍니다. 문법은 다양성을 보이며 대체로 좋은 통제력이 있습니다. 사소한 어색함은 의사소통을 방해하지 않습니다.
밴드 7.5 샘플 에세이
밴드 7.5 에세이는 세련된 어휘, 뉘앙스 있는 논증, 매우 우수한 문법적 통제력을 갖춘 강한 작문 능력을 보여줍니다.
Band 7.5두 파트 질문288단어
문제
전통적인 사무실이 아닌 재택근무를 선택하는 사람들이 점점 늘어나고 있습니다. 왜 이런 현상이 일어나고 있습니까? 이것이 긍정적인 발전이라고 생각합니까, 아니면 부정적인 발전이라고 생각합니까?
샘플 답변
The shift towards remote working has accelerated dramatically in recent years, transforming how millions of professionals approach their careers. This trend is driven by technological advancement and evolving priorities, and while it presents certain challenges, I consider it a predominantly positive development for both individuals and society.
Several interconnected factors explain the migration from office to home. Most fundamentally, digital communication tools have eliminated the technical necessity of physical co-location for many knowledge-based roles. Video conferencing, cloud collaboration platforms, and project management software enable seamless coordination regardless of geography. Simultaneously, workers — particularly younger generations — increasingly prioritise flexibility, autonomy, and work-life integration over traditional markers of career success. The pandemic period demonstrated conclusively that productivity need not suffer outside conventional office environments, dismantling decades of managerial scepticism.
I view this development as largely beneficial for multiple reasons. Eliminating commutes saves workers considerable time and money while significantly reducing transport-related carbon emissions — a meaningful environmental dividend at scale. The geographical liberation of remote work enables skilled professionals to live in affordable regions rather than clustering in expensive urban centres, potentially reducing housing inequality. Companies benefit from access to global talent pools and reduced overhead costs. However, these advantages must be weighed against legitimate concerns: social isolation, difficulty maintaining professional boundaries, and the challenge of mentoring junior staff remotely demand thoughtful solutions.
Ultimately, the remote work revolution represents an evolution rather than a disruption. Organisations that develop hybrid models — combining the flexibility of remote work with purposeful in-person collaboration — will likely achieve optimal outcomes for both productivity and employee wellbeing.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
7.5
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
7.5
{grammaticalRange}
7.0
종합 밴드
7.5
시험관 코멘트
두 질문 모두에 잘 전개된 아이디어로 완전히 답변하고 있습니다. 세련된 단락 관리와 매끄러운 전환을 보여줍니다. 응집성이 두드러진 강점으로, 기계적 연결어 없이 아이디어가 자연스럽게 흐릅니다. 어휘가 정확하고 다양합니다('geographical liberation', 'managerial scepticism', 'environmental dividend'). 문법은 좋은 범위를 보이지만 일부 문장이 지나치게 복잡합니다.
Band 7.5토론형 (양측 견해)295단어
문제
일부 사람들은 범죄를 줄이는 가장 좋은 방법이 더 긴 징역형을 부과하는 것이라고 생각합니다. 그러나 다른 사람들은 범죄를 줄이는 더 나은 대안적 방법이 있다고 생각합니다. 두 가지 견해를 모두 논의하고 자신의 의견을 제시하세요.
샘플 답변
Criminal justice policy represents one of the most contested areas of public debate, with opinions ranging from strictly punitive approaches to rehabilitation-focused alternatives. While longer prison sentences may serve certain limited purposes, I am convinced that evidence-based preventive measures offer far greater potential for sustained crime reduction.
The rationale for extended incarceration rests on two principles: deterrence and incapacitation. Theoretically, the prospect of lengthy imprisonment should discourage potential offenders from committing crimes, while those already convicted are physically prevented from reoffending during their sentence. This approach appeals to public sentiment, particularly following high-profile violent crimes where communities demand visible consequences. For genuinely dangerous individuals who pose ongoing threats to public safety, prolonged removal from society may indeed be the only responsible option.
However, extensive criminological research challenges the assumption that harsher sentences meaningfully deter crime. Recidivism rates in countries with punitive systems often exceed those in nations favouring rehabilitation, suggesting that prison environments may actually reinforce criminal behaviour rather than discourage it. Alternative approaches — community service programmes, restorative justice conferences, addiction treatment, educational opportunities, and early intervention in at-risk communities — address the root causes that drive individuals towards criminal activity. These measures are demonstrably more cost-effective than incarceration while producing lower reoffending rates.
In my assessment, effective crime reduction requires investing in upstream prevention rather than downstream punishment. A society that provides adequate education, mental health support, and economic opportunity will inevitably experience less crime than one which simply builds larger prisons. Incarceration should remain available for the most serious offences, but it cannot constitute a comprehensive crime strategy.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
7.5
{coherenceCohesion}
7.5
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
7.5
종합 밴드
7.5
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 복잡한 주제를 세련되게 다루며 뉘앙스 있는 논증을 보여줍니다. 두 가지 견해가 적절한 단서 조항과 함께 철저히 전개되었습니다. 어휘력이 돋보이는 기준으로, 'recidivism', 'restorative justice', 'upstream prevention'은 주제별 정확성을 보여줍니다. 문법은 다양하며 의욕적인 구문에서 대체로 정확합니다. 각 단락이 이전 단락을 발전시키는 뛰어난 구성을 보여줍니다.
밴드 8.0 샘플 에세이
밴드 8 에세이는 세련된 어휘, 정밀하게 사용되는 복잡한 문법, 충분히 전개된 뉘앙스 있는 논증을 갖춘 전문가 수준의 영어 구사력을 보여줍니다.
Band 8.0의견형 (동의/반대)302단어
문제
일부 사람들은 범죄를 예방하기 위해 정부가 모든 인터넷 및 전화 통신을 감시할 수 있어야 한다고 생각합니다. 다른 사람들은 이것이 사생활을 침해하며 절대 허용되어서는 안 된다고 생각합니다. 이 의견에 어느 정도 동의하거나 반대합니까?
샘플 답변
The tension between state security powers and individual privacy rights has intensified as digital communication becomes the primary medium for both legitimate discourse and criminal planning. I firmly believe that unrestricted government surveillance is fundamentally incompatible with democratic principles, though I acknowledge the necessity of targeted, judicially-supervised monitoring in specific circumstances.
Mass surveillance programmes, regardless of their stated justification, pose existential threats to free societies. When citizens know their communications may be monitored, they self-censor — a phenomenon documented extensively in behavioural research — diminishing the open discourse upon which democratic governance depends. History demonstrates that surveillance powers, once granted, invariably expand beyond their original mandate; temporary emergency measures become permanent fixtures. The practical case against blanket monitoring is equally compelling: security services become overwhelmed with data, potentially missing genuine threats amid billions of innocuous communications. The false positive problem alone renders mass surveillance operationally counterproductive.
This does not imply that law enforcement should operate blind in the digital realm. Targeted surveillance, authorised by independent judiciary upon demonstration of probable cause, represents a proportionate mechanism that balances security needs with civil liberties. This framework — essentially the digital equivalent of a physical search warrant — has functioned effectively in democratic legal systems for centuries and requires only updated application rather than fundamental reimagining.
The critical distinction lies between monitoring populations and investigating suspects. The former treats all citizens as potential criminals, corroding social trust; the latter applies established legal principles to new technological contexts. I therefore advocate for robust judicial oversight mechanisms, strict data retention limits, and meaningful penalties for surveillance abuse, while supporting law enforcement's ability to investigate specific threats through proper channels.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
종합 밴드
8.0
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 이분법적 사고를 피한 세련되고 뉘앙스 있는 입장을 제시합니다. 아이디어는 증거와 논리적 추론을 포함하여 깊이 있게 전개됩니다. 단락 구성이 능숙하며 각 단락이 별개의 수사적 기능을 수행합니다. 어휘는 정확하고 다양하며 연어와 문체에 대한 완전한 인식을 보여줍니다('judicially-supervised', 'existential threats', 'operationally counterproductive'). 문법은 넓은 범위를 보이며 복잡한 구문에서의 오류가 드뭅니다.
Band 8.0토론형 (양측 견해)298단어
문제
일부 사람들은 학교가 수학과 과학 같은 학술 과목에 더 집중해야 한다고 생각합니다. 다른 사람들은 미술과 음악 교육도 똑같이 중요하다고 생각합니다. 두 가지 견해를 모두 논의하고 자신의 의견을 제시하세요.
샘플 답변
Educational priorities reflect deeper societal assumptions about what constitutes valuable knowledge and how young people should be prepared for adult life. While academic subjects undeniably equip students with essential analytical capabilities, I contend that art and music education develops distinct cognitive and emotional competencies that are not merely supplementary but foundational to human flourishing.
The case for prioritising academic disciplines rests on pragmatic economic reasoning. Mathematics, science, and technology drive innovation, economic growth, and national competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-based global economy. Students who excel in these areas typically access more lucrative career paths, and nations with strong STEM performance consistently rank higher in development indices. From a pedagogical standpoint, these subjects develop rigorous logical thinking, evidence evaluation, and quantitative literacy — skills transferable across virtually every professional context.
However, characterising arts education as a luxury misunderstands both its nature and its effects. Neuroscientific research reveals that musical training strengthens working memory, attention control, and mathematical reasoning — the very capacities that STEM subjects require. Visual art develops spatial intelligence, observational precision, and iterative problem-solving through prototyping and revision. Beyond cognitive benefits, arts engagement cultivates emotional intelligence, cultural empathy, and the capacity for original thought that distinguishes human contribution from algorithmic processing. In an era where artificial intelligence increasingly performs routine analytical tasks, creative and interpretive abilities become humanity's comparative advantage.
My position is that the academic-versus-arts framing represents a false dichotomy. Effective education integrates both: mathematics provides the framework for musical composition; scientific inquiry mirrors artistic experimentation; literary analysis sharpens the same critical faculties as hypothesis testing. Schools should resist artificial hierarchies between disciplines and instead recognise that intellectual rigour manifests differently across domains.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.5
{lexicalResource}
8.0
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
종합 밴드
8.0
시험관 코멘트
각 단락이 서로 다른 수사적 전개를 통해 논증을 발전시키는 탁월한 구성입니다. 결론은 논쟁 자체를 재구성하며, 이는 세련된 비판적 사고의 증거입니다. 어휘는 정확한 학술 용어('false dichotomy', 'comparative advantage', 'iterative problem-solving')가 자연스럽게 사용됩니다. 문법은 다양하며 복잡한 구문 전반에 걸쳐 거의 오류가 없습니다. 응집은 기계적 연결어가 아닌 조응과 대치를 통해 자연스럽게 이루어집니다.
Band 8.0문제와 해결책305단어
문제
많은 국가들이 환경 문제, 특히 오염과 천연자원의 과다 사용에 관한 문제를 겪고 있습니다. 이러한 문제의 원인은 무엇이며, 이를 해결하기 위해 어떤 조치를 취할 수 있습니까?
샘플 답변
Environmental degradation through pollution and resource depletion represents perhaps the defining challenge of our era, driven by structural economic incentives that prioritise short-term extraction over long-term sustainability. Addressing these interlinked crises requires systemic interventions that realign economic behaviour with ecological limits.
The root causes extend far beyond individual consumption choices. Industrial economies are fundamentally designed to externalise environmental costs — manufacturers bear no financial consequence for atmospheric pollution, agricultural operations are not charged for watershed contamination, and resource extraction companies need not fund ecosystem restoration. This structural misalignment means that environmentally destructive practices remain artificially profitable. Compounding this, rapid urbanisation concentrates pollution impacts while extending supply chains across continents, obscuring the environmental consequences of consumption from consumers. Population growth and rising living standards amplify demand for energy, food, and materials, accelerating depletion of finite resources.
Effective solutions must operate at the systemic level rather than relying on voluntary behavioural change. Carbon pricing mechanisms — whether cap-and-trade systems or direct taxation — internalise environmental costs, making clean alternatives economically competitive rather than aspirationally virtuous. Circular economy legislation requiring manufacturers to design for disassembly and reuse transforms waste from an inevitable byproduct into a design failure. Investment in renewable infrastructure at scale — solar, wind, and storage — addresses the energy system that underlies most pollution categories. Critically, international cooperation frameworks must prevent regulatory arbitrage, where polluting industries simply relocate to jurisdictions with weaker environmental standards.
These measures are not merely desirable but economically rational when accounting for the staggering costs of climate adaptation, healthcare expenditure from pollution-related illness, and resource scarcity. The transition to sustainable economies represents not a sacrifice of prosperity but a redefinition of it — one that future generations will consider not radical but obvious.
밴드 점수 분석
{taskAchievement}
8.0
{coherenceCohesion}
8.0
{lexicalResource}
8.5
{grammaticalRange}
8.0
종합 밴드
8.0
시험관 코멘트
이 에세이는 표면적 원인을 넘어 체계적 경제 메커니즘까지 파고드는 탁월한 분석 깊이를 보여줍니다. 원인과 해결책 모두 세련된 추론으로 철저히 전개되었습니다. 어휘력이 뛰어나며, 'externalise environmental costs', 'regulatory arbitrage', 'circular economy legislation'은 전문 용어의 정확한 사용을 보여줍니다. 문법은 복잡한 명사구와 종속절로 넓은 범위와 유연성을 보여줍니다. 결론은 논증을 철학적 수준으로 끌어올립니다.
에세이 즉시 채점받기
에세이를 제출하면 4가지 평가 기준 모두에 대한 피드백과 함께 상세한 밴드 점수 분석을 받을 수 있습니다. 수천 편의 시험관 채점 에세이로 훈련된 AI가 채점합니다.
지금 에세이 채점하기자주 묻는 질문
{ielts} {writingTask2} 에세이는 어떻게 채점됩니까?
{ielts} {writingTask2} 에세이는 4가지 기준으로 채점됩니다: {taskAchievement} (25%), {coherenceCohesion} (25%), {lexicalResource} (25%), {grammaticalRange} (25%). 각 기준은 0~9점까지 정수 또는 0.5 단위의 밴드로 채점되며, 4개 점수의 평균이 {writingTask2} 종합 밴드가 됩니다.
밴드 6과 밴드 7 에세이의 차이점은 무엇입니까?
밴드 6 에세이는 관련 아이디어로 과제를 다루지만 일반적이거나 전개가 부족할 수 있습니다. 밴드 7 에세이는 명확한 논리 전개와 함께 확장된 아이디어를 제시하고, 덜 일반적인 어휘를 사용하며, 좋은 정확도로 복문을 작성합니다. 핵심 차이점은 전개의 깊이와 언어의 정확성입니다.
{ielts} {task2} 에세이는 몇 단어를 써야 합니까?
최소 250단어를 작성해야 합니다. 밴드 7 이상의 에세이는 대부분 270~310단어입니다. 250단어에 크게 미달하면 감점됩니다. 300단어 이상 작성해도 괜찮지만 오류 가능성이 높아집니다. 길이보다 질이 더 중요합니다.
{ielts} 시험에서 이 샘플 에세이를 사용할 수 있습니까?
아닙니다. 암기한 에세이는 밴드 0을 받습니다. 시험관은 암기된 답변을 감지하도록 훈련받았습니다. 이 샘플을 활용하여 각 밴드 수준의 특징을 이해하고, 다양한 주제에 대해 자신만의 답변을 연습하세요.
{ielts} {writingTask2}에는 어떤 질문 유형이 출제됩니까?
5가지 주요 질문 유형이 있습니다: 의견형(동의/반대), 토론형(양측 견해 + 의견), 문제와 해결책, 장점과 단점, 두 파트 질문입니다. 각각 약간 다른 구조가 필요하지만, 모두 명확한 입장과 전개된 뒷받침 아이디어가 필요합니다.
Get your IELTS band score in 60 seconds
무료로 시작하기